Skip to content
SpamtacularWhere spam and policy collide
  • Home
  • About Mickey
  • Comment Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Filters are stupid

3 November 2009

Sometimes it bears remembering that many content filters aren’t score-based, but rather string-based. Because of this, you may have to more carefully craft your messages to deal with the fact that the filter cannot take context into account.

And so, today I wish to share with you three different strings actually seen to have caused rejections for bad content.

  • “spic”: Often used as a racial pejorative, this string is used fairly frequently to block mail due to racial insensitivity. The problem? It’s also part of the name of a common household cleaner (Spic And Span).
  • “cialis”: This word is often found in spam for body part enlargement as an alternative to Viagra. It seems to make sense to block on that string until you realize that just looking for those letters strung together in that order also manages to catch other words, like “speCIALISt.”
  • ” cum”: This rather ingenious string was intended to catch sexually-oriented spam. It suffers from the same problem as or previous example, even though there was an attempt to limit the damage by including a leading space. It manages to catch unintended words like “cumbersome.” Maybe they should have included a trailing space, too, eh?

Feel free to add your own examples to the comments. The point I’m making here, though, isn’t just to make fun of filters for catching unintended words, but to make us think about things:

  1. Are the filter strings I’m creating catching just the stuff I want them to catch, or are they catching other things that I wouldn’t mind actually receiving?
  2. Is the copy I’m creating for my campaign likely to get caught by filters where a different choice of words would not?
Read moreThe Eleventh Commandment

Remember, at the end of the day, a string-based filter is stupid in that it can’t tell the difference between an off-color, stupid, insensitive (and likely not even funny) joke, and the announcement of a sale on cleaning products. So, is it better to block that string and have my janitorial staff miss a sale on products we actually use or not block that string and potentially face a lawsuit?

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Email
Tags: Anti-spam techniques

Calendar

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« Oct   Dec »

Archives

  • November 2021
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • January 2017
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • March 2011
  • January 2011
  • November 2010
  • July 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • April 2008

Categories

  • Administrivia
  • Industry
  • Law
  • Policy
  • Spam
  • Uncategorized

Copyright Spamtacular 2023 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress