
Confirm to unsubscribe?
A question comes in this morning:
Requiring the confirmation of an email address in an unsubscription is not CAN-SPAM compliant, right?
While I’m not a lawyer, to my understanding that is absolutely correct. The current implementing rules for CAN-SPAM state:
Neither a sender nor any person acting on behalf of a sender may require that any recipient pay any fee, provide any information other than the recipient’s electronic mail address and opt-out preferences, or take any other steps except sending a reply electronic mail message or visiting a single Internet Web page, in order to:
(a) Use a return electronic mail address or other Internet-based mechanism, required by 15 U.S.C. 7704(a)(3), to submit a request not to receive future commercial electronic mail messages from a sender; or
(b) Have such a request honored as required by 15 U.S.C. 7704(a)(3)(B) and (a)(4).
(Federal Trade Commission 2008) (emphasis added)
My assumption in answering this question is that the issue here is that the sender wants to use a confirmed, or double, opt-out approach. This would be a violation of CAN-SPAM because requiring that confirmation step is requiring take steps other than sending a reply electronic mail message or visiting a single Internet Web page to effect the opt-out.
The technology exists to encode the recipient’s address into the URL or the reply-to field so that unsubscription shouldn’t take more than a single blank email or a visit to a single page. And since that’s what the law currently requires, that’s what you should be doing.
References
- Federal Trade Commission. 2008. “§316.5 Prohibition on Charging a Fee or Imposing Other Requirements on Recipients Who Wish to Opt Out.” Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. May 21, 2008. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?rgn=div5&node=16:1.0.1.3.40#se16.1.316_15.
Archives
- November 2021
- July 2020
- June 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- January 2017
- August 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- June 2012
- April 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
- October 2008
- September 2008
- April 2008