Canada’s anti-spam law: Does it apply to me?
Lots of time and space has been dedicated to an examination of Canada’s new anti-spam law. And we have been watching it too. For a
Mickey
30 March 2011
Legal developments affecting email, marketing regulations, and business operations. Expert analysis of court decisions, legislation, and regulatory guidance.
Lots of time and space has been dedicated to an examination of Canada’s new anti-spam law. And we have been watching it too. For a
One of the first things I learned when I became a legal assistant is that there are rarely any pat answers. A blanket assertion is
An interesting question comes in today: “Is it required by law to unsubscribe feedback loop complaints received by senders?” And I call it interesting because
An interesting question came across my desk this morning. Here’s the request from someone we’ll call “Joe”: I need some help understanding CAN-SPAM requirements. I
The 9th Circuit opinion in USA v. Kilbride1 has been released. This is primarily an obscenity case against the defendants for sending pornographic spam email.
The 9th Circuit opinion in [acp author=”9th Circuit Court of Appeals” url=”http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=us+v+kilbride&hl=en&as_sdt=6,44&case=17927549797826193178&scilh=0″ title=”USA v. Kilbride” year=”2009″ month=”October” day=”28″ media=”website” publisher=”Google Scholar”]{title}, (9th Cir., {year})[/acp] has
Today, we have another guest blog from the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email (CAUCE). Last night, Neil Schwartzman, CAUCE’s Executive Director, sent me the following
Today, we have a guest blog from the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email (CAUCE). CAUCE has been heavily involved in crafting a worthy anti-spam law
Question comes in this morning: Hey Mick? Requiring the confirmation of an email address in an unsubscription is not CAN-SPAM compliant, right? That is absolutely
Question comes in this morning: Hey Mick? Requiring the confirmation of an email address in an unsubscription is not CAN-SPAM compliant, right? That is absolutely
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |