<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is transactional mail not transactional anymore?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/</link>
	<description>Where Email, Delivery, and Law come together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 22:59:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
<a href="http://www.spamtacular.com/hydrozoanqueue.php" rel="nofollow"><span style="display:none;">copyright</span></a>	<item>
		<title>By: MickC</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>MickC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1196#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>Without knowing more about what&#039;s going on, my first thought is that this would be transactional mail, and not subject to the unsubscription requirements.  The unsubscription requirements only attach to commercial email.  So, if the mail that is being sent isn&#039;t marketing anything, it&#039;s probably okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without knowing more about what&#8217;s going on, my first thought is that this would be transactional mail, and not subject to the unsubscription requirements.  The unsubscription requirements only attach to commercial email.  So, if the mail that is being sent isn&#8217;t marketing anything, it&#8217;s probably okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tauren Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tauren Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1196#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>Do you know if I can send email to members who have unsubscribed, who&#039;s membership has expired, but for one reason or another still owe money? These emails would not be marketing emails, simply debt collection messages. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if I can send email to members who have unsubscribed, who&#039;s membership has expired, but for one reason or another still owe money? These emails would not be marketing emails, simply debt collection messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; Top 10 Posts of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; Top 10 Posts of 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1196#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>[...] When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? This post was over what changes the nature of a mailing. In this case, it was a date on a membership card. Mail sent before the expiration date is transactional, but mail sent after is commercial marketing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? This post was over what changes the nature of a mailing. In this case, it was a date on a membership card. Mail sent before the expiration date is transactional, but mail sent after is commercial marketing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1196#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Great points and investigation, Mickey! 
Now that the Act has been around for a while and they have seen more use cases, the FTC could definately use some further clarification on CAN-SPAM. Especially with the rise of transactional messaging over the past two years.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points and investigation, Mickey!<br />
Now that the Act has been around for a while and they have seen more use cases, the FTC could definately use some further clarification on CAN-SPAM. Especially with the rise of transactional messaging over the past two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Marketing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2009-12-02</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Marketing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2009-12-02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1196#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>[...] When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? “In the case of a membership association, does the nature of a membership renewal message transform from transactional to commercial solely on the basis whether the membership is current?&#8221; (tags: transactional_emails canspam legislation) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? “In the case of a membership association, does the nature of a membership renewal message transform from transactional to commercial solely on the basis whether the membership is current?&#8221; (tags: transactional_emails canspam legislation) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1196#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by spamtacularcom: New blog post: When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? http://bit.ly/7E8qLm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by spamtacularcom: New blog post: When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? <a href="http://bit.ly/7E8qLm.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7E8qLm..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Mickey Chandler's Spamtacular &#124; When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Mickey Chandler's Spamtacular &#124; When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1196#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Caldwell, Spamtacular.com. Spamtacular.com said: New blog post: When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? http://bit.ly/7E8qLm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Caldwell, Spamtacular.com. Spamtacular.com said: New blog post: When is transactional mail not transactional anymore? <a href="http://bit.ly/7E8qLm" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7E8qLm</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
