<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filters are stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/11/03/filters-are-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/11/03/filters-are-stupid/</link>
	<description>Where Email, Delivery, and Law come together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19841</generator>
<span style="display:none;"><a href="http://www.spamtacular.com/hydrozoanqueue.php" rel="nofollow">copyright</a></span>	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Mickey Chandler's Spamtacular &#124; Filters are stupid -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/11/03/filters-are-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Mickey Chandler's Spamtacular &#124; Filters are stupid -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1025#comment-804</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Email marketing, etc, Jonathan Loriaux. Jonathan Loriaux said: RT @ESPs Filters are stupid http://bit.ly/3SJ2cs #spam #email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Email marketing, etc, Jonathan Loriaux. Jonathan Loriaux said: RT @ESPs Filters are stupid <a href="http://bit.ly/3SJ2cs" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3SJ2cs</a> #spam #email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Mickey Chandler's Spamtacular &#124; Filters are stupid -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/11/03/filters-are-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Mickey Chandler's Spamtacular &#124; Filters are stupid -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1025#comment-803</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Caldwell, Mickey Chandler. Mickey Chandler said: New blog post: Filters are stupid http://bit.ly/40SRf7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Caldwell, Mickey Chandler. Mickey Chandler said: New blog post: Filters are stupid <a href="http://bit.ly/40SRf7" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/40SRf7</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/11/03/filters-are-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1025#comment-802</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by jacaldwell: RT @spamtacularcom: New blog post: Filters are stupid http://bit.ly/40SRf7 (jac: interesting post, Mickey)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by jacaldwell: RT @spamtacularcom: New blog post: Filters are stupid <a href="http://bit.ly/40SRf7" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/40SRf7</a> (jac: interesting post, Mickey)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spamfighter</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/11/03/filters-are-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>spamfighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=1025#comment-800</guid>
		<description>I once saw AT&amp;T bounce a message I sent to a user named lipshitz on their system due to an overly-aggressive content filter going after to: fields.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once saw AT&amp;T bounce a message I sent to a user named lipshitz on their system due to an overly-aggressive content filter going after to: fields.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

