<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SORBS Closure Imminent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=sorbs-closure-imminent</link>
	<description>Where Email, Delivery, and Law come together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickc</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>mickc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen a lawsuit against a DNSBL, no matter how poorly run, work well, so that wouldn&#039;t be any sort of suggested course of action.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve never seen a lawsuit against a DNSBL, no matter how poorly run, work well, so that wouldn&#039;t be any sort of suggested course of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jab</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>I would be please if SORBS  could be closed. It has been an cyber robber so far. You have to pay them the get IP delisted and they would list your IP for no reason. If they don&#039;t get closed, I am going to start up a web site collecting money to sue them.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be please if SORBS  could be closed. It has been an cyber robber so far. You have to pay them the get IP delisted and they would list your IP for no reason. If they don&#039;t get closed, I am going to start up a web site collecting money to sue them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; Top 10 Posts of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; Top 10 Posts of 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>[...] SORBS Closure Imminent. This was a post about the announcement by Michelle Sullivan that the SORBS DNSBL was in danger of closing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SORBS Closure Imminent. This was a post about the announcement by Michelle Sullivan that the SORBS DNSBL was in danger of closing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-822</guid>
		<description>Who cares.  
Sorbs stopped being relevant years ago. Please die (now). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares.<br />
Sorbs stopped being relevant years ago. Please die (now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sturner</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Sturner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-766</guid>
		<description>The only thing is Great ITS shut down...now how about getting all the 3rd party spam filters who reference that database to reject it and not use their cached/proxied  results...what a mess </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing is Great ITS shut down&#8230;now how about getting all the 3rd party spam filters who reference that database to reject it and not use their cached/proxied  results&#8230;what a mess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holger</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Holger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-764</guid>
		<description>I have used SORBS for about 3 years for circa 500 domain names, and found their list very impartial. Sure, you have to maintain a whitelist but this is mainly because large ISPs are simply unable to ensure that outgoing spam is being blocked. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used SORBS for about 3 years for circa 500 domain names, and found their list very impartial. Sure, you have to maintain a whitelist but this is mainly because large ISPs are simply unable to ensure that outgoing spam is being blocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-739</guid>
		<description>@Some Guy: I second that, SORBS sucked big time, was a xenophobous and stupid RBL, and I will merrily spit on its grave when it shut down. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Some Guy: I second that, SORBS sucked big time, was a xenophobous and stupid RBL, and I will merrily spit on its grave when it shut down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-713</guid>
		<description>SORBS sucked. Repeated listings of IP ranges for no reason other than ego stroking, and complete avoidance of responsibility. 
 
My bet is somebody got pissed off enough to sic their lawyers on UoQ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SORBS sucked. Repeated listings of IP ranges for no reason other than ego stroking, and complete avoidance of responsibility. </p>
<p>My bet is somebody got pissed off enough to sic their lawyers on UoQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickc</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>mickc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-711</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not how I recall it happening. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s not how I recall it happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=930#comment-709</guid>
		<description>At 35000+ spams per day, an issue with the ESP point of contact had little to do with it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 35000+ spams per day, an issue with the ESP point of contact had little to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
