Comments on: Three Questions to Define http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/31/three-questions/ Where Email, Delivery, and Law come together Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:11:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19841 By: Huey http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/31/three-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-650 Huey Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:33:59 +0000 http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=845#comment-650 1) the intersection of 'segmenting' and 'targeting' 3) a combination of 'not CAN-SPAM compliant', 'not permission-based', and... 2) ...this is the hard bit, since the users will complain about whatever they damn well please. Also, to a certain extent, I think the same guys the ISPs go after are the ones that have huge numbers of complaints. So the real question probably isn't "can you find the not-spam?", but rather "What sort of mail is it in your best interests to be sending?", which'd be the point of the diagram. Right? 1) the intersection of ‘segmenting’and ‘targeting’
3) a combination of ‘not CAN-SPAM compliant’, ‘not permission-based’, and…
2) …this is the hard bit, since the users will complain about whatever they damn well please.

Also, to a certain extent, I think the same guys the ISPs go after are the ones that have huge numbers of complaints. So the real question probably isn’t “can you find the not-spam?”, but rather “What sort of mail is it in your best interests to be sending?”, which’d be the point of the diagram. Right?

]]>