<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prior Business Relationships are irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/07/prior-business-relationships-are-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/07/prior-business-relationships-are-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>Where Email, Delivery, and Law come together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19841</generator>
<span style="display:none;"><a href="http://www.spamtacular.com/hydrozoanqueue.php" rel="nofollow">international</a></span>	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Chandler&#039;s Spamtacular &#124; Pre-Existing Business Relationships Don&#8217;t Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/07/prior-business-relationships-are-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Chandler&#039;s Spamtacular &#124; Pre-Existing Business Relationships Don&#8217;t Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=784#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>[...] the use of the phrase &#8220;transactional or relationship message&#8221; in the statute. As I have previously explained, CAN-SPAM does not contain a &#8220;prior business relationship&#8221; clause. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the use of the phrase &#8220;transactional or relationship message&#8221; in the statute. As I have previously explained, CAN-SPAM does not contain a &#8220;prior business relationship&#8221; clause. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; Handling Unsubscribe Requests</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/07/prior-business-relationships-are-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; Handling Unsubscribe Requests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=784#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>[...] (which an unsubscription confirmation would be) or commercial is found in the term &#8220;primary purpose.&#8221; This term is one found in the statutory definition of &#8220;transactional or relationship [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (which an unsubscription confirmation would be) or commercial is found in the term &#8220;primary purpose.&#8221; This term is one found in the statutory definition of &#8220;transactional or relationship [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; When is transactional mail not transactional anymore?</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/07/prior-business-relationships-are-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Chandler&#39;s Spamtacular &#124; When is transactional mail not transactional anymore?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=784#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>[...] CAN-SPAM does not apply to transactional messages. I have a post on that here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CAN-SPAM does not apply to transactional messages. I have a post on that here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New email related blog at Word to the Wise</title>
		<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2008/10/07/prior-business-relationships-are-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>New email related blog at Word to the Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spamtacular.com/?p=784#comment-625</guid>
		<description>[...] He moved a number of posts from his other blog, but today has a new post up about how a prior business relationship impacts compliance with CAN SPAM. He concludes with: for most people is that prior business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He moved a number of posts from his other blog, but today has a new post up about how a prior business relationship impacts compliance with CAN SPAM. He concludes with: for most people is that prior business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

